9                                            Waste Management Assessment

9.1                                      Introduction

This section identifies the potential waste arising from the construction and operation of the Project and assesses the potential environmental impacts associated with waste handling and disposal.  The main issues are:

·           Management of dredged materials;

·           Handling and disposal of contaminated sediments;

·           Handling and disposal of construction and demolition (C&D) materials arising from the river modification, excavation and construction works; and

·           Management of chemical waste and general refuse.

Waste avoidance, minimisation, reuse and recycling, storage, collection, transport and disposal schemes have been examined and appropriate measures for waste reduction and management have been proposed. 

9.2                                      Legislation Requirements and Evaluation Criteria

The following discussion on legislative requirements and evaluation criteria applies to both the construction and operational phases of the Project.  The criteria and guidelines for evaluating potential waste management implications are laid out in Annexes 7 and 15 of the EIAO-TM under the EIAO (Cap 499).  The following legislation covers, or has some bearing upon the handling, treatment and disposal of the wastes generated from the construction and operation of the Project.

·           Waste Disposal Ordinance (Cap 354);

·           Waste Disposal (Chemical Waste) (General) Regulation (Cap 354C);

·           Land (Miscellaneous Provisions) Ordinance (Cap 28);

·           Public Health and Municipal Services Ordinance (Cap 132) - Public Cleansing and Prevention of Nuisances Regulation; and 

·           Dumping at Sea Ordinance (Cap 466).

 

9.2.1                                Waste Disposal Ordinance (Cap 354)

The Waste Disposal Ordinance (WDO) prohibits the unauthorised disposal of wastes, with waste defined as any substance or article, which is abandoned.  Construction waste is not directly defined in the WDO but is considered to fall within the category of ‘trade waste’.  Trade waste is defined as waste from any trade, manufacturer or business or any wasted building, or civil engineering materials, but does not include animal waste.

Under the WDO, wastes can only be disposed of at a licensed site.  The WDO provides for the issuing of licences for the collection and transport of wastes.  Licences are not, however, currently issued for the collection and transport of construction waste or trade waste.

The Waste Disposal (Charges for Disposal of Construction Waste) Regulation defined construction waste as any substance, matters or things that is generated from construction work and abandoned, whether or not it has been processed or stockpiled before being abandoned.  It does not include any sludge, screening or matter removed in or generated from any desludging, desilting or dredging works. 

The Construction Waste Disposal Charging Scheme entered into operation on 1 December 2005.   Starting from 1 December 2005, the main contractor who undertakes construction work under a contract with value of HK$1 million or above is required to open a billing account solely for the contract for waste disposal.  Application shall be made within 21 days after the contract is awarded.  

Depending on the percentage of inert materials in the construction waste, inert construction waste can be disposed of at public fill reception facilities.  However mixed construction waste can be disposed of at construction waste sorting facilities, landfills and Outlying Islands Transfer Facilities which have different disposal costs.  The scheme encourages reducing, reusing and sorting of construction waste such that the waste producer can reduce their disposal fee.  Table 9.1 summarises the government construction waste disposal facilities, types of waste accepted and disposal cost.

Table 9.1        Government Facilities for Disposal of C&D Materials

Government Waste Disposal Facilities

Type of Construction Waste Accepted

Charge (HK$/Tonne)

Public fill reception facilities

Consisting entirely of inert construction waste

$27

Sorting facilities

Containing more than 50% by weight of inert construction waste

$100

Landfills

Containing not more than 50% by weight of inert construction waste

$125

Outlying Islands Transfer Facilities

Containing any percentage of inert construction waste

$125

9.2.2                                Waste Disposal (Chemical Waste) (General) Regulation (Cap 354C)

Chemical waste as defined under the Waste Disposal (Chemical Waste) (General) Regulation includes any substance being scrap material, or unwanted substances specified under Schedule 1 of the Regulation, if the specified substance or chemical occurs in such a form, quantity or concentration so as to cause pollution or constitute a danger to health or risk of pollution to the environment.

A person should not produce, or cause to be produced, chemical wastes without registration with the EPD.  Chemical wastes must either be treated using on-site facility licensed by EPD or be collected by a licensed collector for off-site treatment at a licensed facility.  Under EPD Regulation, the waste producer, collector and disposal facility must sign all relevant parts of a computerised trip ticket for each consignment of waste.  The computerized system is designed to allow the transfer of wastes to be traced from cradle-to-grave.

The EPD Regulation prescribes storage facilities to be provided on-site which include labelling and warning signs.  To reduce the risks of pollution and danger to human health or life, the waste producer is required to prepare and make available written emergency procedures for spillage, leakage or accidents arising from the storage of chemical wastes. They must also provide their employees with training on such procedures.

9.2.3                                Land (Miscellaneous Provisions) Ordinance (Cap 28)

The inert portion of C&D materials (also called public fill) may be taken to public fill reception facilities.  Public fill reception facilities usually form part of land reclamation schemes and are operated by the Civil Engineering and Development Department (CEDD) and others.  The Land (Miscellaneous Provisions) Ordinance requires that individuals or companies who deliver public fill to the public fill reception facilities to obtain Dumping Licences.  The licences are issued by CEDD under delegated authority from the Director of Lands.

Individual licences and windscreen stickers are issued for each vehicle involved.  Under the licence conditions, public fill reception facilities will only accept earth, soil, sand, rubble, brick, tile, rock, boulder, concrete, asphalt, masonry or used bentonite.  In addition, in accordance with paragraph 11 of ETWB TCW No. 31/2004 “Trip Ticket System for Disposal of Construction and Demolition Materials”, the Public Fill Committee will advise on the acceptance criteria (e.g. no mixing of construction waste, nominal size of the materials less than 250mm, etc).  The material will, however, be free from marine mud, household refuse, plastic, metal, industrial and chemical wastes, animal and vegetable matter and any other materials considered unsuitable by the public fill reception facility supervisor.

9.2.4                                Public Health and Municipal Services Ordinance (Cap 132) - Public Cleansing and Prevention of Nuisances Regulation

This Regulation provides a further control on the illegal dumping of wastes on unauthorised (unlicensed) sites. 

9.2.5                                Dumping at Sea Ordinance (Cap 466)

This Ordinance came into operation in April 1995 and empowers the Director of Environmental Protection (DEP) to control the disposal and incineration of substances and articles at sea for the protection of the marine environment.  Under the Ordinance, a permit from the DEP is required for the disposal of regulated substances within and outside the waters of the Hong Kong SAR.  The permit contains terms and conditions that includes the following specifications:

·           Type and quantity of substances permitted to be dumped;

·           Location of the disposal grounds;

·           Requirement of equipment for monitoring the disposal operations; and

·           Environmental monitoring requirements.

Management of Dredged/Excavated Sediments for Marine Disposal

Marine disposal of any dredged/excavated sediment is subject to control under the Dumping at Sea Ordinance 1995.  Dredged/excavated sediment destined for marine disposal is classified based on its contaminant levels with reference to the Chemical Exceedance Levels (CEL), as stipulated in ETWB TC(W) No. 34/2002: Management of Dredged/Excavated Sediment.  This Technical Circular includes a set of sediment quality criteria, as presented in Table 9.2, which includes heavy metals and metalloids, organic pollutants and a class of contamination level for highly contaminated sediment not suitable for marine disposal.

Table 9.2        Dredged/Excavated Sediment Quality Criteria for the Classification under the ETWB TC(W) No. 34/2002

Contaminants

Lower Chemical Exceedance Level (LCEL)

Upper Chemical Exceedance Level (UCEL)

Metals (mg kg-1 dry weight)

Cd

1.5

4

Cr

80

160

Cu

65

110

Hg

0.5

1

Ni (a)

40

40

Pb

75

110

Silver (Ag)

1

2

Zinc (Zn)

 

200

270

Metalloid (mg kg-1 dry weight)

Arsenic (As)

 

12

42

Organic-PAHs (mg kg-1 dry weight)

Low Molecular Weight (LMW) PAHs

550

3,160

High Molecular Weight (HMW) PAHs

 

1,700

9,600

Organic-non-PAHs (mg kg-1 dry weight)

Total PCBs

 

23

180

Organometallics (mgTBT l-1 in interstitial water)

Tributyl-tin (a)

0.15

0.15

Note:

(a)     The contaminant level is considered to have exceeded the UCEL if it is greater than the value shown.

In accordance with ETWB TC(W) No. 34/2002, the sediment is classified into three categories based on its contamination levels:

Category L :   Sediment with all contaminant levels not exceeding the LCEL.  The material must be dredged, transported and disposed of in a manner which reduces the loss of contaminants either into solution or by re-suspension.

Category M :   Any one or more contaminants in the sediment exceeding the LCEL with none exceeding the UCEL.  The material must be dredged and transported with care, and must be effectively isolated from the environment upon final disposal unless appropriate biological tests demonstrate that the material will not adversely affect the marine environment.

Category H :   Any one or more contaminants in the sediment exceeding the UCEL.  The material must be dredged and transported with great care, and must be effectively isolated from the environment upon final disposal.

Figure 9.1 summarises the sediment classification and disposal arrangements.  EPD will use the sediment and biological test results to determine the most appropriate disposal site (e.g. open sea or confined marine disposal site).

Figure 9.1      Management Framework for Dredged/Excavated Sediment

Notes: 

1.              Most open sea disposal sites are multi-user facilities and as a consequence their management involves a flexibility to accommodate varying and unpredictable circumstances. Contract documents will include provisions to allow the same degree of flexibility to divert from one disposal site to another during the construction period of a contract.

2.              Dedicated Sites will be monitored to confirm that there is no adverse impact.

3.              For sediment requiring Type 2 or Type 3 disposal, contract documents will state the allocation conditions of Marine Fill Committee (MFC) and DEP. At present, East Sha Chau Mud Pits are designated for confined marine disposal.

4.              If any sediment suitable for Type 3 disposal (Category H sediment failing the biological dilution test) is identified, it is the responsibility of the project proponent, in consultation with DEP, to identify and agree, the most appropriate treatment and/or disposal arrangement. Such a proposal is likely to be very site and project specific and therefore cannot be prescribed. This does not preclude treatment of this sediment to render it suitable for confined marine disposal.

5.              The allocation of disposal space may carry a requirement for the project proponent to arrange for chemical analysis of the sediment sampled from 5% of the vessels en-route to the disposal site. For Category M and certain Category H sediment, the chemical tests will be augmented by biological tests. Vessel sampling will normally entail mixing five samples to form a composite sample from the vessel and undertaking laboratory tests on this composite sample. All marine disposal sites will be monitored under the general direction of the CEDD. However, exceptionally large allocations might require some additional disposal site monitoring. These will be stipulated at the time of allocation.

6.              Trailer suction hopper dredgers disposing of sediment at the East Sha Chau Mud Pits must use a down-a-pipe disposal method, the design of which must be approved in advance by Director of the CEDD. The dredging contractor must provide equipment for such disposal.

Source: Appendix C, ETWBTC(W) 34/2002

In addition, in accordance with Building Ordinance Office Practice Note for Authorised Persons and Registered Structural Engineers No. 252, any proposal to remove more than 500,000 m3 of clean mud or any quantity of contaminated mud must be justified on both cost and environmental grounds.  The rationale for such removal will also be provided to enable an allocation for disposal to be considered.  Therefore it is desirable to demonstrate that any proposed mud dredging has been reduced as far as reasonably and safely practicable and to obtain, in-principle, an agreement from the Secretary of the Marine Fill Committee (MFC) of the CEDD at an early stage.

9.2.6                                Other Relevant Guidelines

Other guideline documents which detail how the Contractor will comply with the WDO and its associated regulations include:

·           Waste Disposal Plan for Hong Kong (December 1989), Planning, Environment and Lands Branch Government Secretariat, Hong Kong Government;

·           Chapter 9 - Environment (1999), Hong Kong Planning Standards and Guidelines, Hong Kong Government;

·           New Disposal Arrangements for Construction Waste (1992), EPD & CED, Hong Kong SAR Government;

·           Code of Practice on the Packaging, Labelling and Storage of Chemical Wastes (1992), EPD, Hong Kong Government;

·           ETWBTC(G) No. 2/93B, Public Filling Facilities, Works Branch, Hong Kong Government;

·           Waste Reduction Framework Plan, 1998 to 2007, Planning, Environment and Lands Bureau, Government Secretariat, 5 November 1998;

·           ETWB TC(W) Nos. 25/99, 25/99A and 25/99C, Incorporation of Information on Construction and Demolition Material Management in Public Works Sub-committee Papers; Works Bureau, Hong Kong SAR Government;

·           ETWB TC(W) No. 12/2000, Fill Management; Works Bureau, Hong Kong SAR Government;

·           ETWB TC(W) Nos. 6/2002 and 6/2002A, Enhanced Specification for Site Cleanliness and Tidiness. Works Bureau, Hong Kong SAR Government; and

·           ETWB TC(W) No. 34/2002, Management of Dredged/Excavated Sediment; Environment, Transport and Works Bureau, Hong Kong SAR Government.

·           ETWB TC(W) No. 19/2005 Environmental Management on Construction Site; Environment, Transport and Works Bureau, Hong Kong SAR Government.

9.3                                      Expected Waste Sources

9.3.1                                Construction Phase

During the construction phase, the main activities, which will result in the generation of waste, include dredging of river sediment, soil excavation, embankment construction, sewage diversion works, landscaping works (collectively referred as “river modification and associated works”), and boundary patrol road and boundary fence re-provisioning (referred as “advanced works”).  The typical waste types associated with these activities include:

·           Dredged river sediment;

·           C&D materials;

·           Chemical waste; and

·           General refuse.

9.3.2                                Operation Phase

Maintenance dredging of sediment may be required at the flood retardation pond.  As the flood retardation pond is about 2.2 ha, the scale and volume of the dredging required will be significantly smaller than that during the capital work construction. 

9.4                                      Assessment Methodology

The potential environmental impacts associated with the handling and disposal of waste arising from the construction and operation of the Project were assessed in accordance with the criteria presented in Annexes 7 and 15 of the EIAO-TM and summarised as follows:

·         Estimation of the types and quantities of the wastes to be generated based on information provided by the Engineering Design Team and the relevant research and studies on waste arisings;

·         Assessment of the secondary environmental impacts due to the management of waste with respect to potential hazards, air and odour emissions, noise, wastewater discharges and traffic; and

·         Assessment of the potential impacts on the capacity of waste collection, transfer and disposal facilities.

9.5                                      Waste Management Assessment

9.5.1                                Construction Phase

Dredged River Sediment

Sediment Sampling and Testing under the Feasibility Study

The construction of the Project will require excavation and disposal of river sediments.  Under the Planning and Feasibility Study for Training of Upstream Section of Shenzhen River, twenty (20) river sediment samples were collected at five (5) locations within the Study Area and tested in accordance with the requirements stipulated in the ETWB TC(W) No. 34/2002 for an initial assessment of the nature of contaminated materials in the river sediment and the locations of the contaminated sediments.  Sediment samples were collected along the vertical profile of the proposed dredging layers (ie the top of the sediment layer, 0.9 m, 1.9m, 2.9 m below the seabed, and at the maximum excavation depth, upon refusal or when rock head is encountered) at each location. 

Sediment Sampling and Testing under this EIA

A sediment sampling programme has been undertaken as part of this EIA Study to delineate the locations of the contaminated sediment and enable subsequent estimation of different types of sediments (ie contaminated and uncontaminated sediments) to be disposed of for the purpose of the EIA.  A Sediment Sampling and Testing Plan has been prepared and submitted to the EPD (see Annex E1).  River bed sediment samples have been collected at eight (8) locations (Figure 9.2).  The proposed dredging activity for the Project is anticipated to be limited to approximately 1 m along the river course and up to around 5 m in the future flood retardation pond area.  Grab sampling method has been used to collect surface sediment for locations where dredging will be limited to 1 m or less.  Where excavation is expected to go down to 5 m (ie sampling location SR4), sediment samples were collected along the vertical profile of the proposed dredging layers (ie the top of the sediment layer, 0.9 m, 1.9m, 2.9 m below the seabed, and at the maximum excavation depth, upon refusal or when rock head is encountered).   The sediments samples were then tested in accordance with the requirements stipulated in the ETWB TC(W) No. 34/2002. 

Sediment Analytical Results

The sediment analytical results are presented in Table 9.3.  The full laboratory analytical results are contained in Annex E2.  Sediment from 21 of the 33 samples tested were found with all contaminant levels not exceeding the LCEL and thus classified as Category L materials.  The heavy metals concentrations in 6 samples were found between the LCEL and UCEL and thus classified as Category M contaminated materials.  The concentrations in 6 samples were found exceeded the UCEL and thus classified as Category H contaminated materials. 

Tier III biological screening was conducted to identify the most appropriate disposal option for the Category M contaminated materials in accordance with the ETWB TC(W) No. 34/2002.  Results of the biological screening indicated that of the 6 sediment samples tested, two samples (ie SD5 2.9m & SR8) passed all three toxicity tests while sediment from the rest 4 samples failed in at least one of the three toxicity tests. 


Table 9.3   Summary of Sediment Sampling Results

 

Sampling Location (j)

Sampling Depth (m below river bed)

Metals and Metalloids (mg/kg)

Low M.Wt PAHs (µg/kg)

High M.Wt PAHs (µg/kg)

Total PCBs (µg/kg)

TBT in interstitial water (µg/L) (i)

Overall Sediment Class(c),(d),(e)

Requires Bio-logical Testing?

Results of Bio-logical Test

Disposal Location (k)

Arsenic (As)

Cadmium (Cd)

Chromium (Cr)

Copper (Cu)

Lead (Pb)

Mercury (Hg)

Nickel (Ni)

Silver (Ag)

Zinc (Zn)

Reporting Limits

 

1

0.2

1

1

1

0.05

1

0.1

1

< 550

< 1,700

< 3

0.015

 

 

 

 

LCEL(f)       

 

12

1.5

80

65

75

0.5

40

1

200

550

1,700

23

0.15

 

 

 

 

UCEL(f)

 

42

4

160

110

110

1

40

2

270

3,160

9,600

180

0.15

 

 

 

 

SD1

Surface

2.8

0.42

10

<7.0

46

<0.05

5.9

0.18

52

ND

ND

ND

ND

L

No

-

O

SD1

0.9

3.5

0.21

<8.0

9.0

26

<0.05

<4.0

<0.10

20

ND

ND

ND

ND

L

No

-

O

SD1

1.9

<1.0

<0.20

<8.0

<7.0

16

<0.05

<4.0

<0.10

<20

ND

ND

ND

ND

L

No

-

O

SD1

2.9

<1.0

<0.20

<8.0

<7.0

12

<0.05

<4.0

<0.10

<20

ND

ND

ND

ND

L

No

-

O

SD2

Surface

1.1

1.3

52

82

120

0.21

24

1.3

430

ND

ND

ND

ND

H

No

-

C

SD2

0.9

3.1

0.25

<8.0

12

52

<0.05

<4.0

0.23

40

ND

ND

ND

ND

L

No

-

O

SD2

1.9

1.2

<0.20

<8.0

<7.0

22

<0.05

<4.0

<0.10

<20

ND

ND

ND

ND

L

No

-

O

SD2

2.9

12

0.48

<8.0

9.0

<8.0

<0.05

5.9

0.12

91

ND

ND

ND

ND

L

No

-

O

SD2

5.9

6.5

0.35

<8.0

8.7

19

<0.05

<4.0

<0.10

44

ND

ND

ND

ND

L

No

-

O

SD3

Surface

2.0

0.25

<8.0

9.9

37

<0.05

4.3

0.10

45

ND

ND

ND

ND

L

No

-

O

SD3

0.9

2.4

<0.20

<8.0

8.6

31

<0.05

<4.0

<0.10

22

ND

ND

ND

ND

L

No

-

O

SD3

1.9

8.5

1.7

26

14

50

<0.05

<4.0

<0.10

93

ND

ND

ND

ND

M

Yes

Fail

C

SD3

2.9

<1.0

0.27

9.6

14

<8.0

<0.05

7.3

<0.10

21

ND

ND

ND

ND

L

No

-

O

SD4

Surface

2.0

<0.20

<8.0

<7.0

34

<0.05

<4.0

<0.10

28

ND

ND

ND

ND

L

No

-

O

SD4

0.9

6.0

0.31

<8.0

11

50

<0.05

4.0

<0.10

48

ND

ND

ND

ND

L

No

-

O

SD4

1.9

11

1.6

12

40

170

<0.05

15

0.34

180

ND

ND

ND

ND

H

No

-

C

SD4

2.9

2.5

0.26

<8.0

42

62

<0.05

4.4

0.14

56

ND

ND

ND

ND

L

No

-

O

SD5

Surface

45

1.9

71

130

120

1.4

84

1.4

560

ND

ND

ND

ND

H

No

-

C

SD5

0.9

12

0.71

<8.0

30

160

<0.05

11

0.20

72

ND

ND

ND

ND

H

No

-

C

SD5

1.9

5.1

0.35

<8.0

14

120

<0.05

<4.0

<0.10

48

ND

ND

ND

ND

H

No

-

C

SD5

2.9

5.3

0.42

<8.0

14

100

<0.05

<4.0

0.10

61

ND

ND

ND

ND

M

Yes

Pass

O (D)

SR1

Surface

2

<0.2

4

6

37

<0.05

3

<0.1

31

ND

ND

ND

NA

L

No

-

O

SR2

Surface

3

0.2

6

9

57

<0.05

3

0.2

44

ND

ND

ND

NA

L

No

-

O

SR3

Surface

6

0.4

28

31

78

<0.05

17

0.3

122

ND

ND

ND

NA

M

Yes

Fail

C

SR4

Surface

6

0.4

11

21

86

<0.05

13

0.1

71

ND

ND

ND

NA

M

Yes

Fail

C

SR4

0.9

3

0.2

9

21

54

<0.05

5

<0.1

45

ND

ND

ND

NA

L

No

-

O

SR4

1.9

5

0.2

7

12

58

<0.05

4

<0.1

34

ND

ND

ND

NA

L

No

-

O

SR4

2.9

1

<0.2

3

7

41

<0.05

2

<0.1

20

ND

ND

ND

NA

L

No

-

O

SR5

Surface

3

0.4

22

20

39

0.11

14

0.7

84

ND

ND

ND

NA

L

No

-

O

SR5

Dup

3

0.2

28

23

26

<0.05

16

0.2

92

ND

ND

ND

NA

L

No

-

O

SR6

Surface

7

0.8

8

14

97

<0.05

10

0.3

112

ND

ND

ND

NA

M

Yes

Fail

C

SR7

Surface

28

2.6

46

108

167

1.16

222

2.7

651

ND

ND

ND

NA

H

No

-

C

SR8

Surface

7

2.1

3

10

67

<0.05

4

0.1

228

ND

ND

ND

NA

M

Yes

Pass

O (D)

Notes:

(a)  Underlined results = Samples with contaminant concentrations exceeding LCEL

(b)  Bold results = Samples with contaminant concentrations exceeding UCEL

(c)  Category L = Sediment with all contaminant levels not exceeding the LCEL. The material must be dredged, transported and disposed of in a manner which minimizes the loss of contaminants either into solution or by resuspension.

(d)  Category M = Sediment with any one or more contaminant levels exceeding the LCEL and none exceeding the UCEL.  The material must be dredged and transported with care, and must be effectively isolated from the environment upon final disposal unless appropriate biological tests demonstrate that the material will not adversely affect the marine environment.

(e)  Category H = Sediment with any one or more contaminant levels exceeding the UCEL.  The material must be dredged and transported with great care, and must be effectively isolated from the environment upon final disposal.

(f)    CEL = Chemical Exceedance Levels as stipulated in Environment, Transport and Works Bureau Technical Circular (WBTC) No. 34/2002, Management of Dredged/Excavated Sediment.  These included the Lower and Upper Chemical Exceedance Levels (LCEL, UCEL).

(g)  NA = Not Available

(h)  ND = Not Detected

(i)    Analysis of tributyltin (TBT) in interstitial water were cancelled for samples collected during the EIA Study due to insufficient volume of interstitial water.

(j)    Locations with ID “SR” are sampled as part of the EIA Study while locations with ID “SD” are sampled as part of the FS Study.

(k)  Disposal location in accordance with the management framework in ETWB TC(W) No 34/2002.  O = Type 1 Open Sea Disposal, O (D) = Type 1 Open Sea Disposal (Dedicated Sites), C = Type 2 Confined Marine Disposal.

 


The latest design information of the Project shows that about 95,000 m3 (in situ volume) of sediments would be dredged during the construction phase of the Project.  Based on the sediment testing results, it is estimated that about 27,000 m3 (in situ volume) would be Category L sediment.  About 4,000 m3 (in situ volume) would be Category M contaminated sediments (passed biological screening), whereas about 64,000 m3 (in situ volume) would be Category M contaminated (failed biological screening) sediments or Category H contaminated sediment.  The detailed breakdown of estimated quantities of different types of river sediments to be dredged from this Project is summarised in Table 9.4. 

Table 9.4        Estimated Quantities of Different Sediments to be Dredged

Works Area

Period

Category L Sediment (m3)

Category M - (passed biological screening) (m3)

Category M (failed biological screening) and Category H (m3)

Total (m3)

I

2013 Q4 – 2014 Q1

-

4,000

11,600

15,600

II

2013 Q4 – 2014 Q1

4,000

-

18,000

22,000

III

2014 Q4 – 2015 Q1

-

-

21,600

21,600

IV

2014 Q4 – 2015 Q1

23,000

-

12,800

35,800

Total

 

27,000

4,000

64,000

95,000

Due to the space limitation, onsite disposal of sediment along the riverside within the Project Site is considered not practical.  In addition, potential environmental impacts, such as leachate, odour, air and noise impacts etc, may occur if sediments are not properly disposed.  Therefore all sediments will be disposed offsite.

A site search in Shenzhen and Hong Kong has been carried out to identify the potential disposal sites for sediments.  The Huangmao Dao in Zhuhai is one of the major marine disposal sites in the South China Sea which only accepts uncontaminated spoils.  And currently there is no facility available for disposal of contaminated sediment in Shenzhen.  In Hong Kong, the Marine Fill Committee (MFC) of CEDD has maintained various marine disposal areas within the HKSAR for disposing of sediment at different level of contamination in accordance with the ETWB TC(W) No. 34/2002.

After reviewing the site disposal options, it is proposed that Category L sediments are to be disposed of at Huangmao Dao.  Category M (passed biological screening) sediments are to be disposed of at Type 1 Open Sea / Type 1 Open Sea (Dedicated Sites) disposal areas in HKSAR.  These facilities are designated by the State or Hong Kong SAR Government and therefore the associated environmental impacts are considered to be negligible.

Type 2 confined marine disposal site in Hong Kong is the only designated disposal site available for contaminated sediment for the Project.  As the Project Site located at the boundary of the HKSAR and the Shenzhen Municipality and the works area covered both municipalities, the origin of contaminated sediment cannot be clearly distinguished.  Disposal of all Category M contaminated (failed biological screening) sediments or Category H contaminated sediment at the Type 2 confined marine disposal site in Hong Kong is therefore considered as the only appropriate option.

The proposed disposal options for the respective categories of river sediment arising from the Project are provided in Table 9.5. 

Table 9.5        Proposed Disposal Options for River Sediments   

Types of Sediment

In-situ Volume (m3)

Proposed Disposal Location 

Category L

27,000

Huangmao Dao in Zhuhai

Category M (passed biological screening)

4,000

Type 1 Open Sea Disposal (Dedicated Sites) to the areas managed by the CEDD in the HKSAR

 

Category M (failed biological screening) and Category H 

64,000

Type 2 Confined Marine Disposal to the facilities managed by the CEDD in the HKSAR (a)

Total

95,000

-

Note:

(a)  The existing facility in Hong Kong receiving Type 2 sediment is East Sha Chau Contaminated Mud Pit.  It is understood that the anticipated closure year of this facility is around 2014 and a new contaminated mud receiving facilities in South of Brothers is under planning by CEDD.  

The testing results and the disposal options presented in this Report are for EIA purposes only.  To confirm the sediment disposal quantity and location, a separate Sediment Sampling and Testing Plan (SSTP) and Sediment Quality Report (SQR) will be prepared in accordance with the requirement stated in ETWB TC(W) No. 34/2002 for EPD approval as required under the Dumping at Sea Ordinance.  The final disposal site will be determined by the MFC of CEDD and a dumping licence will be obtained from EPD prior to the commencement of the dredging works.

The Shenzhen River Regulation Office and the DSD will obtain confirmation from the MFC in Hong Kong and the Shenzhen Marine Management Office (深圳海洋管理處) for the proposed disposal arrangement before the commencement of the construction works.  Dredging work will only be proceeded after all issues on management of dredged sediments have been resolved and all relevant arrangements have been endorsed by the relevant authorities, including EPD, MFC and the Shenzhen Marine Management Office.

Potential Environmental Impacts Associated with the Disposal of Dredged Sediment

The dredged sediments and the excavated spoils will be temporary stored at separate stockpiling areas within the Project Site.  In order to avoid secondary pollution during transportation, the dredged sediment will be dewatered at the stockpiling areas before disposal.  The filtrates resulted from dewatering will be sent to the on-site sedimentation tanks before discharge back into the river.

The dewatered sediment will then be loaded onto trucks and transported to Shekou Pier via Yan Fang Road (on the Shenzhen side) for further transporting to designated disposal areas depending on their level of contamination.  It is estimated that a maximum of 71 truck trips per day will be required to dispose sediment offsite ([1]).  In fact, it is very likely that the number of truck trips will be lower given that the volume the dredged sediment will be reduced after dewatering.   

The potential dust, gaseous emissions and odour impact associated with the transportation of sediment / surplus C&D materials have been discussed in the Section 4 Air Quality Impact Assessment.  With the implementation of good site practices and proper mitigation measures, no adverse air and odour impact is anticipated.  

The disposal of dewatered dredged sediment will be conducted during day-time and given the number of truck trips generated per day, noise nuisance is not anticipated. 

The transportation routes will be located within the Shenzhen Bay and is far away from the Mai Po Marsh.  Potential impact on birds in Mai Po Marsh is therefore not anticipated. 

C&D Materials

Advanced Works

It is estimated that about 15,000m3 of C&D materials will be generated from site clearance, fence installation and checkpoint removal and construction activities during the Project’s advanced works.  The inert C&D materials are mainly broken concrete from demolition of existing structures and fence footings, broken bituminous materials from demolition of existing boundary patrol road and steel from demolition of existing boundary fence.  These materials are not suitable for reuse on site and will therefore be disposed off site.  The materials will be properly sorted on site before delivered to the designated public fill reception facility.  A small quantity of 3,750 m3 of construction waste will be disposal of at the NENT Landfill.

River Modification and the Associated Works

It is estimated that about 586,000 m3 of inert C&D materials (excavated materials such as soils and rocks) will be generated from river widening, embankment construction, sewage diversion and landscaping works.  All inert C&D materials will be properly sorted on site and stored separately.  It is estimated that about 114,800 of inert C&D materials will be reused on-site for backfilling or embankment construction and the surplus C&D materials (about 471,200 m3) will be sent to Huangmao Dao (黃茅島) in Zhuhai.  The estimated quantities of C&D materials to be generated and reused at different works areas are summarised in Table 9.6. 

Table 9.6        Quantities of Excavated Materials at Each Works Area

Works Area

C&D Material (Excavated Materials) Arisings (m3)

Reuse On-site (m3)

Surplus C&D Materials (m3) for Off-site Disposal

I

124,360

20,840

103,520

II

136,400

8,800

127,600

III

245,580

32,000

213,580

IV

79,660

53,160

26,500

Total

586,000

114,800

471,200

About 9,200 m3 of construction waste, such as superficial soil with vegetations, timber and general refuse will be generated from site clearance.  These non-inert materials will be sent to landfills in Shenzhen for disposal.

The Shenzhen River Regulation Office and the DSD shall obtain confirmation from the Public Fill Committee (PFC) in Hong Kong and the Shenzhen Marine Management Office (深圳海洋管理處) for the proposed disposal arrangement before the commencement of the construction works.  Construction work will only be proceeded after all issues on management of C&D material have been resolved and all relevant arrangements have been endorsed by the relevant authorities, including EPD, PFC and the Shenzhen Marine Management Office.

Potential Environmental Impacts Associated with the Disposal of C&D Materials

The surplus inert C&D materials (public fill) and construction waste generated from the advanced works will be disposed of at public fill reception facilities and landfill in Hong Kong, respectively.  It is estimated that a total of 8 truck trips per days (about 6 truck trips per day for public fill and 2 truck trips per days for construction waste) will be required to dispose the materials/waste off-site respectively ([2]) .  In view of the small quantity of C&D materials generated and with proper implementation of good site practices and mitigation measures recommended in Sections 4.6, potential water quality, dust and noise impacts associated with on-site handling and transportation of the public fill and construction waste to disposal sites are not expected.

The surplus inert C&D materials generated from river modification works will be sent to Shekou Pier by land transport on the Shenzhen side for further transporting to Huangmao Dao in Zhuhai.  It is estimated that about 148 truck trips per day will be required to dispose inert C&D materials during peak construction period ([3]) .  It is also estimated that a maximum of 5 truck trips per day will be required to dispose the non-inert materials to landfills in Shenzhen.  With proper implementation of good site practices and mitigation measures, no adverse environmental impact is anticipated.   

Chemical Wastes

Chemical waste, as defined under the Waste Disposal (Chemical Waste) (General) Regulation, includes any substance being scrap material, or unwanted substances specified under Schedule 1 of the Regulation.  A complete list of such substances is provided under the Regulation; however, substances likely to be generated from the construction of the advanced works and river modification works under this Project will, for the most part, arise from the maintenance of construction plant and equipment.  These may include, but not limited to the following:

·           Scrap batteries or spent acid/alkali from their maintenance;

·           Used engine oils, hydraulic fluids and waste fuel;

·           Spent mineral oils/cleaning fluids from mechanical machinery; and

·           Spent solvents/solutions from equipment cleaning activities.

Chemical wastes may pose environmental, health and safety hazards if not stored and disposed of in an appropriate manner as outlined in the Waste Disposal (Chemical Waste) (General) Regulation and the Code of Practice on the Packaging, Labelling and Storage of Chemical Wastes.  These hazards may include:

·           Toxic effects to workers;

·           Adverse effects on air, water and land from spills; and

·           Fire hazards.

The amount of chemical waste that will arise from the construction activities will be highly dependent on the Contractor’s on-site maintenance activities and the quantity of plant and equipment utilized.  With respect to the nature of construction works and the number of equipment to be used on site, it is estimated that about a few hundred litres of used lubricant oil will be generated per month during the construction period.  It is anticipated that the quantities of waste solvent will be minimal.

With the incorporation of suitable arrangements for the storage, handling, transportation and disposal of chemical wastes under the requirements stated in the Code of Practice on the Packaging, Labelling and Storage of Chemical Waste, no adverse environmental and health impacts, and hazards will result from the handling, transportation and disposal of chemical waste arising from the Project.

General Refuse

The presence of a construction site with workers and associated site office will result in the generation of general refuse (mainly consist of food waste, aluminium cans and waste paper) which requires off-site disposal.  The storage of general refuse has the potential to give rise to adverse environmental impacts.  These include odour if the waste is not collected frequently, windblown litter, water quality impacts if waste enters water bodies, and visual impact. 

Assuming up to 1,350 construction workers will be working on site at any one time, with a general refuse generation rate of 0.65 kg per worker per day ([4]) , the amount of general refuse to be generated will be about 878 kg per day.  Assuming that the split of workers would be 1,050 workers for the River Modification and Associated Works and 300 workers for the Advanced Works, the amount of general refuse generated per day would be 682.5 kg and 195 kg for the respective contract.

Recyclable materials such as paper and aluminium cans will be separated and delivered to the local recyclers.  An adequate number of waste containers will be provided to avoid spillage of waste.  The non-recyclable waste will be collected and disposed of at landfills in Shenzhen (during the river modification and associated works) or the NENT Landfill in HKSAR (during the advanced works) on a regular basis.  With respect to the small quantity of general refuse to be transferred, it is not anticipated that it will cause adverse operational impact to these facilities.

9.5.2                                Operation Phase

Dredged River Sediment from Maintenance Dredging

The frequency and scale of the maintenance dredging required along the river channel and the flood retardation pond is anticipated to be very small compared with the dredging works during the capital works construction. The volume of sediment cannot be determined at this stage but is anticipated to be significantly lower than the volume of capital work dredging during the construction phase.  The disposal and handling of the dredged materials will follow the requirements stipulated in the ETWB TC(W) No. 34/2002.

9.6                                      Mitigation Measures

Waste Management Hierarchy

The various waste management options are categorised in terms of preference from an environmental viewpoint.  The options considered to be most preferable have the least environmental impacts and are more sustainable in the long term.  The hierarchy is as follows:

·           Avoidance and reduction;

·           Reuse of materials;

·           Recovery and recycling; and,

·           Treatment and disposal.

The above hierarchy has been used to evaluate and select waste management options.  The aim has been to reduce waste generation and reduce waste handling and disposal costs.

Should waste be disposed of in the HKSAR, all contractors will consult the EPD for the final disposal of wastes and as appropriate implement the standard site practices and mitigation measures recommended in this EIA and those given below.

·           Nomination of approved personnel to be responsible for standard site practices, arrangements for collection and effective disposal to an appropriate facility of all wastes generated at the Project Site;

·           Training of site personnel in proper waste management and chemical handling procedures;

·           Provision of sufficient waste disposal points and regular collection for disposal;

·           Appropriate measures to reduce windblown litter and dust transportation of waste by either covering trucks or by transporting wastes in enclosed containers;

·           Separation of chemical wastes for special handling and appropriate treatment at the licensed hazardous waste treatment facility in Shenzhen (during the river modification and associated works) or the Chemical Waste Treatment Centre at Tsing Yi (during the advanced works);

·           Regular cleaning and maintenance programme for drainage systems, sumps and oil interceptors; and

·           A recording system for the amount of wastes generated/ recycled and disposal sites.

Waste Reduction Measures 

Good management and control can prevent generation of significant amount of waste.  Waste reduction is best achieved at the planning and design stage, as well as by ensuring the implementation of standard site practices.  Recommendations to achieve waste reduction include:

·           Segregation and storage of different types of waste in different containers, skips or stockpiles to enhance reuse or recycling of material and their proper disposal;

·           Encourage collection of aluminium cans and waste paper by individual collectors during construction with separate labelled bins provided to segregate these wastes from other general refuse by the workforce;

·           Any unused chemicals and those with remaining functional capacity will be recycled as far as possible;

·           Use of reusable non-timber formwork to reduce the amount of construction waste;

·           Prior to disposal of construction waste, wood, steel and other metals will be separated to the extent practical, for re-use and/or recycling to reduce the quantity of waste to be disposed of to landfill;

·           Proper storage and site practices to reduce the potential for damage or contamination of construction materials; and

·           Plan and stock construction materials carefully to reduce amount of waste generated and avoid unnecessary generation of waste.

9.6.1                                Dredged Sediments

To minimise any potential odour impact, the dredged sediment will be stored in enclosed container and will be delivered to Shekou Pier by enclosed trucks. 

The disposal of dredged river sediment will follow the requirements stipulated in the ETWB TC(W) No. 34/2002.  Detailed sampling and chemical testing will be carried out prior to the commencement of the dredging activities to confirm the sediment disposal method.  The final disposal site will be determined by the MFC and a dumping licence will be obtained from EPD prior to the commencement of the dredging works. 

9.6.2                                Excavated Materials

Management of Waste Disposal

During the advanced works, the contractor will open a billing account with EPD in accordance with the Waste Disposal (Charges for Disposal of Construction Waste) Regulation for the payment of disposal charges.  Every waste load transferred to Government waste disposal facilities in HKSAR such as public fill, sorting facilities, landfills or transfer station will require a valid “Chit” which contains the information of the account holder to facilitate waste transaction recording and billing to the waste producer.  A trip-ticket system will be established in accordance with ETWB TC(W) No. 31/2004 to monitor the reuse of surplus excavated materials off-site and disposal of construction waste and general refuse at landfills, and to control fly-tipping.  The billing “chit” and trip ticket system will be included as one of the contractual requirements and implemented by the contractor. 

 

Minimization of C&D Material Generation

Ways to minimise generation of C&D materials include:

(i)            The Contractor is required to submit the Waste Management Plan (WMP) for approval by the Engineer with appropriate mitigation measures to deal with and allow space for waste segregation.  Different C&D materials should be sorted into different categories for re-use/recycle.  Day-to-day site operations of the Contractor should be closely monitored to ensure compliance with the approved WMP.

(ii)           The designer shall ensure that the design of levels and dimensions are reasonably accurate to avoid unnecessary demolition, excavation and fill.

(iii)         The Contractor shall be encouraged to use long lasting materials such as steel and poly-fibre for formwork on site.

(iv)         The RSS shall control the disposal of public fill and C&D waste to the designated public filling facilities and landfills respectively through the implementation of a trip-ticket system according to ETWB TC(W) No. 31/2004.

Maximization of C&D material Reuse, Recovery and Recycling

Ways to maximize the use of inert C&D material include:

(i)            The Contractor shall review the WMP quarterly to improve the site practice and maximise the use of inert C&D material.

(ii)          Different sections of works shall be programmed to ensure the C&D materials generated could be re-used by the other sections of works or works contracts.

(iii)         Temporary storage areas should be identified to resolve programming mismatch between excavation and filling works.

(iv)        The excavated soft inert C&D materials should be reused for backfilling the boundary patrol road, channel embankment, etc. whenever practicable.

(v)          Good quality top soil should be reused for landscaping.

Ways to maximise the re-use/recycle of C&D material and/or rock on site include:

(i)            Recyclable materials such as wood and metal should be salvaged for reuse and inert materials utilized as public fill.

(ii)          Segregation and storage of different types of waste in different containers, skips or stockpiles to enhance reuse or recycling of material and their proper disposal.  Prior to disposal of C&D waste, it is recommended that wood, steel and other metals be separated for re-use and/or recycling and inert waste utilized as fill material to minimize the quantity of waste to be disposed of at landfills.

Ways to maximise the use of recycled C&D materials include:

(i)            Relevant clauses would be incorporated in the Particular Specifications to facilitate the use of recycled aggregates as far as practicable, such as, temporary works, general fills and road sub-base.

To reduce the potential dust impacts of the excavation works, the C&D materials will be wetted as quickly as possible to the extent practice after filling.

9.6.3                                Chemical Waste

During the advanced works, the contractor will be registered with the EPD.

Chemical waste, as defined by Schedule 1 of the Waste Disposal (Chemical Waste) (General) Regulation, will be handled in accordance with the Code of Practice on the Packaging, Handling and Storage of Chemical Wastes as follows.  Containers used for storage of chemical wastes will:

·           Be suitable for the substance they are holding, resistant to corrosion, maintained in a good condition, and securely closed;

·           Have a capacity of less than 450 litres unless the specifications have been approved by the EPD; and

·           Display a label in English and Chinese in accordance with instructions prescribed in Schedule 2 of the Regulations.

The storage area for chemical wastes will:

·           Be clearly labelled and used solely for the storage of chemical waste;

·           Be enclosed on at least 3 sides;

·           Have an impermeable floor and bunding, of capacity to accommodate 110% of the volume of the largest container or 20% by volume of the chemical waste stored in that area, whichever is the greatest;

·           Have adequate ventilation;

·           Be covered to prevent rainfall entering (water collected within the bund must be tested and disposed of as chemical waste, if necessary); and

·           Be arranged so that incompatible materials are appropriately separated.

Chemical waste will be disposed of:

·           Via a licensed waste collector; and

·           To a facility licensed to receive chemical waste, such as the Chemical Waste Treatment Facility which also offers a chemical waste collection service and can supply the necessary storage containers.

9.6.4                                General Refuse

General refuse will be stored in enclosed bins or compaction units separately from construction and chemical wastes.  A reputable waste collector will be employed by the Contractor to remove general refuse from the site, separately from construction and chemical wastes, on a daily basis to reduce odour, pest and litter impacts.  The burning of refuse on site should be prohibited.

Recycling bins will be provided at strategic locations to facilitate recovery of aluminium can and waste paper from the site.  Materials recovered will be sold for recycling.

9.6.5                                Staff Training

Training will be provided to workers on the concepts of site cleanliness and appropriate waste management procedures, including waste reduction, reuse and recycling at the beginning of the construction works.

9.7                                      Residual Environmental Impacts

With the implementation of the recommended mitigation measures, no adverse residual impacts are anticipated from the construction and operation of the Project.

9.8                                      Environmental Monitoring and Audit Requirements

9.8.1                                Construction Phase

To facilitate monitoring and control over the contractors’ performance on waste management (for both advanced works, and river modification works and the associated works), a waste monitoring and audit programme will be implemented throughout the construction phase and a Waste Management Plan (WMP) will be prepared and implemented in accordance with ETWB TC(W) No. 19/2005.  The aims of the monitoring and audit programme are:

·            To review the WMP, which will form part of the Environmental Management Plan (EMP) in accordance with ETWB TC(W) No. 19/2005, including the quantities and types of C&D materials generated, reused and disposed of off-site; the amount of fill materials exported from/imported to the site and the quantity of timber used in temporary works construction for each process/activity;

·            To monitor the implementation and achievement of the WMP on site to assess its effectiveness; and

·            To monitor the follow-up actions on deficiencies identified.

Site inspections will be undertaken each month.  Particular attention will be given to the contractor’s provision of sufficient spaces, adequacy of resources and facilities for on-site sorting and temporary storage of C&D materials.  The C&D materials to be disposed of from the site will be visually inspected to ensure the absence of non-inert materials (eg general refuse, timber, etc).  Furthermore, the waste to be disposed of at landfills will as practicable contains no observable inert or reusable/recyclable C&D materials (eg soil, broken rock, metal, and paper/cardboard packaging, etc).  Any irregularities observed during the site inspections will be raised promptly to the contractor for rectification.

The findings of the waste inspections will be reported in the Environmental Monitoring and Audit Reports.

9.8.2                                Operation Phase

Waste management will be the maintenance party’s responsibility to ensure that all wastes produced during the maintenance dredging are handled and disposed of in accordance with the recommended mitigation measures and EPD’s regulations and requirements. 

9.9                                      Conclusions

During the construction phase, the main activities, which will result in the generation of waste, include dredging of river sediment, soil excavation, embankment construction, sewage diversion works, landscaping works, and patrol road and boundary fence re-provisioning.  The waste types associated with these activities include dredged river sediment, C&D materials, chemical waste, sewage and general refuse.

It is estimated that the gross total C&D materials generated from the Advanced Works will be about 18,750 m3.  About 15,000 m3 will be inert but are not suitable for reuse on site.  These materials will be disposed of in a public fill reception facility in HKSAR.  A small quantity of about 3,750 m3 of construction waste (non-inert C&D material) will be disposal of at the NENT Landfill.

It is estimated that a gross total excavated materials generated from the river modification and associated works will be about 690,200m3, comprising 95,000 m3 of river sediment, 586,000 m3 of inert C&D material and 9,200 m3 of non-inert C&D material (construction waste).  For the 95,000 m3 river sediment, about 27,000 m3 with all contaminants levels not exceeding the LCEL (Category L) will be disposed of at Huangmao Dao in Zhuhai, and the remaining sediments (with Categories M and H) of 68,000 m3 will be disposed of at the Type 1 (dedicated) and Type 2 marine disposal facilities as appropriate within the HKSAR, to be determined by the MFC of the CEDD.  Of the 595,200 m3 C&D materials, about 586,000 m3 are inert in nature.  About 114,800 m3 of these inert C&D materials will be reused on site for backfilling or embankment construction and the surplus inert C&D materials of about 471,200 m3 will be disposed of at Huangmao Dao (黃茅島) in Zhuhai.  About 9,200 m3 of construction waste (non-inert materials) will be generated and require disposed of at landfills in Shenzhen.

During the peak construction period, approximately 878.5 kg of general refuse will be generated (195 kg from Advanced Works and 682.5 kg from River Modification and Associated Works).  General refuse will be disposed of at landfills in Shenzhen or at NENT Landfill in the HKSAR (during the advanced works).  Provided that the general refuse are properly collected and disposed of at regular intervals, no adverse environmental impacts are envisaged.

Chemical waste will be handled in accordance with the Code of Practice on the Packaging, Handling and Storage of Chemical Wastes.  During the advanced work, the chemical waste will be collected by a licensed chemical waste collector to the Chemical Waste Treatment Facility for disposal.  During the river modification and the associated works, the chemical waste will be collected and disposed of at licensed hazardous waste treatment facilities in Shenzhen.

Table 9.7 summarises the type, quantity and disposal location of waste to be generated from the construction of this Project.

Table 9.7        Summary of Waste to be generated during Construction

Type of Waste

Quantity

Proposed Disposal Location

Advance Work

 

 

Sediment

-

-

Surplus inert C&D materials (m3)

15,000

Public fill reception facility in HKSAR

Construction Waste (m3)

3,750

NENT Landfill

Chemical Waste

Few hundred litres per month

Chemical Waste Treatment Centre in Tsing Yi.

General Refuse

195 kg per day

NENT Landfill in HKSAR

 

 

 

River Modification and Associated Works

Sediment (m3)

 

 

Category L

27,000

Huangmao Dao in Zhuhai

Category M (passed biological screening)

4,000

Type 1 Open Sea Disposal (Dedicated Sites) to the areas managed by the CEDD in the HKSAR

Category M (failed biological screening) and Category H

64,000

Type 2 Confined Marine Disposal to the facilities managed by the CEDD in the HKSAR

Surplus inert C&D materials (m3)

471,200

Huangmao Dao in Zhuhai

Construction Waste (m3)

9,200

Landfills in Shenzhen

Chemical Waste

Few hundred litres per month

To a facility licensed to receive chemical waste in Shenzhen

General Refuse (kg per day)

682.5 kg per day

Landfills in Shenzhen

Notes:

1.       In-situ volume

 

Maintenance dredging will be carried out along the river channel and the flood retardation pond.  The volume of sediment cannot be determined at this stage but is anticipated to be less than the volume of capital work dredging during the construction phase.  The disposal and handling of the dredged materials will follow the requirement in the ETWB TC(W) No. 34/2002.

With the implementation of general good construction site practices, it is not anticipated that the construction and operation of the Project will cause adverse environmental impacts due to handling, transportation and disposal of the wastes.


 



([1])     Assuming a capacity of 7 m3 per truck, bulk factor of 1.3 and 25 working days a month. The maximum dredging period is assumed to be 2014 Q4 – 2015 Q1 (6 months).

([2])       Assuming a capacity of 7 m3 per truck, bulk factor of 1.4 and 25 working days a month.  The duration of civil works for advance work is 22 months.

([3])       Assuming a capacity of 7 m3 per truck, bulk factor of 1.4 and 25 working days a month.  It is also assumed that all four works areas are working simultaneously during peak construction period.

([4])       This is considered as a conservative estimate based on the number reported in a number of EIA reports approved under the EIAO.